Given China and India's growth, should I rethink what a diversified portfolio looks like? - ftse xinhua china
I invest for a period of 30 years and I have a hypothesis that has brought most of my money in index funds on the stock markets of India (India Index Exchange Traded Note) and China (the iShares FTSE / Xinhua China 25 should be combined index), because that's growing economies. I have heard that U.S. companies such as GE, Gillette, Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, etc. are used to benefit the countries coming, but I still believe that foreign companies better understand, based in these countries and exploit these markets. And why should we assume that the U.S. markets are safer for the money that China or India? In terms of education, the U.S. is not looking too competitive for 20 or 30 years from now and it's not good for an economy based on innovation. For my investment capital, this distribution was intended:
Fidelity Asset Manager (85%) - 20%
India Stock Index Exchange Traded Note (INP) - 40%
iShares FTSE / Xinhua China 25 Index (FXI) - 40%
Friday, January 22, 2010
Ftse Xinhua China Given China And India's Growth, Should I Rethink What A Diversified Portfolio Looks Like?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
stop spamming the wealth quest community college forum you JACKASS !!!
ReplyDeleteMy biggest concern is the lack of an industry accounting developed there. China has a high probability of false accounting.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, you ever had a moment between India by himself? Then become an auditor time between India and the whistle when asked to falsify the financial statements to see? no.
My biggest concern is the lack of an industry accounting developed there. China has a high probability of false accounting.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, you ever had a moment between India by himself? Then become an auditor time between India and the whistle when asked to falsify the financial statements to see? no.
My biggest concern is the lack of an industry accounting developed there. China has a high probability of false accounting.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, you ever had a moment between India by himself? Then become an auditor time between India and the whistle when asked to falsify the financial statements to see? no.
I like your iShares FTSE, but I would try to come within the next few years ... possibly in 2010.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a big fan of index variation in India. I'm not a big fan of index funds. Here's why: The indices were never designed to do more than a barometer of market performance. They were never designed to outperform the market and are therefore used on a par with the market or below market. She died at the international level in terms of participation, however. The impact of U.S. growth on an international level is only obvious, but it depends heavily on the success of the U.S. Dollar. When China tried and download some of their dependence on the USD against the EUR. Today is not all power, but rather the creation of a basket of currencies, of which 70% is the dollar, but it is a sign of things to come. Since you mentioned a time horizon of 30 years, I would think the back of the head.
China and India are quite expensive. China is expensive, but the dynamics of FDI for the UpComOlympic ING attractive anyway. India is a result of inflation and the market is expensive / government inefficiency. They are provided to solve this problem, but a lengthy process.
My focus is currently on emerging markets, that a current account surplus and a large amount of currency reserves are concentrated. These markets need to be heavily on exports and imports that harm your account. Therefore I am looking to Singapore and Vietnam, Colombia and in the quest to get to have economies that are ready, well in case of a global recession (or even survive a recession in the States United States) and are actually quite cheap.
Since iShares already, you may want to examine some of these ETF markets.
I would also consider adjusting your portfolio to include a kind of bonus. Municipal Bonds personal favorites, because they are exempt from federal taxes and are generally exempt from state taxes. When her money to expand outside the original allocation, you can cut the percentagesPercentage of their income capture and storage requirements. I prefer bonds, bond funds are not!
So, to summarize, I would try to limit its exposure to China, and perhaps find something else that India Index ETN. And then think again reduce its allocation of total investments involve certain municipal bonds in Singapore and Vietnam, or the iShares ETF.
It is a virtual consensus among investors for the next 20 to 30 years, both in India and China to most other economies. A few are what we consider;
ReplyDelete1. The volatility in emerging markets may may have ups and downs, also important, a prolonged period (months or years), a low or no growth, followed by huge gains. This could be a good strategy if you are patient and not the kind of investor who is affected and to sell when the investment is substantially reduced.
2. "There are several other emerging economies of diversification, which has great potential as Vietnam, Brazil, Russia and South Africa, to name a few. If, to invest in a broadly diversified funds, which could EEM or VWO further diversify the to reduce volatility.
not bad.
ReplyDeleteThat the proposed allocation would be very risky, but they are probably correct in his thinking. However, when considering the potential in China and India do not need to allocate 80% of its assets, exploit opportunities. Nearly 10% of each site is sufficient and 15% were very aggressive. I must say that I am not in favor of index funds. The capitalization weighting of them is bad for investment diversification and also increases the risk of certain portfolio. I am much in favor of the diversification of mutual funds. I do not want to neglect to invest in other parts of the world, even if FAM as a small part of the international equity portfolios.
ReplyDelete